
One topic that has really stuck with me over the past week or two is “Christian” artists covering secular songs. Be it on a CD or in concert, it doesn’t really matter. I guess I was first exposed to this with DC Talk doing “Jesus is Still Alright”, an extension and not really a cover of “Jesus is Just Alright” by the Doobie Brothers and the Byrds. More recently while attending an unnamed traveling Christian Concert Tour, I saw DecemberRadio do a cover of Kansas’ “Carry On My Wayward Son” and EleventySeven do a cover of “The Backstreet Boys “I Want It That Way”. The later was done purely for comedic value (and was quite funny), but a cover nonetheless.
The question is….. Is this acceptable? Does this glorify God? Is this edifying to Christians? To those questions I would have to give it a big “NO”. Admittedly, my ears did perk a bit when I heard DecemberRadio plug in to a Kansas song. Why? Because at the time I had spent 30sumodd years of my life listening to that kind of music, (I even saw Kansas in concert in the early 80’s) as well as a lot of heavier artists and none glorified God. So when I got home I had to look into Kansas a little further. Come to find out a couple of the guys are/ were professing Christians and even released some Christian CD’s at one point.
I also did a quick search of other Christian artists that have covered secular songs. One that came to mind before my search was Third Day covering U2’s “With Or Without You” during the medley on their “Offerings II” release. (I’ll just firmly state without apology that U2 is NOT a Christian band, and until they denounce their catholic faith there is not much hope in me seeing them any differently, and no I am not a Pharisee, just a Bible believing Christian that happens to BELIEVE what the bible says and not the mainstream… sorry for that PSA). If you go here there is a list of some songs that have been covered by “Christian” artists.
Personally I frown heavily on someone that calls his or her self a Christian and sings a Beatles’ song. I mean, what’s the process like? Do you just think “Oh, that will be cool to sing” or do you look past all the worldliness and sinfulness of that type of artist and think that you might be able to draw a person to Christ using a song by somebody they have heard before? Let me emphatically point out that it is the Father that draws people to the Son John 6:44 – not a cheesy cover song. One song that really popped off of the list was “Crazy Chain” covered by Jars Of Clay in concert. Who would have thunk it? JOC is a favorite of mine, Ozzy Osborne used to be, back in my sinful life. In fact I was introduced to Ozzy at Youth Camp at my former church. Now how’s that for irony? But an Ozzy song? A Beatles song?
It's also increasingly alarming that secular songs are making it to “worship” services as well. In fact see below for a “worship” band at New Spring Church covering AC/DC’s Highway To Hell on Easter Morning. Does the word Blasphemy come to mind to anyone but me? From what I see on the web, this is a common thing to do now. Maybe not at this shocking level, but Coldplay is a name that keeps coming up. So it’s a downward spiral (and no I’m not quoting Nine Inch Nails) into the pit, or toilet. It is getting progressively worse as one “church” sees what another is doing and they then push it a little further. All the while the “pastor” sits back and bangs his head as the congregation becomes larger and his numbers get bigger. That is typical as well in that most modern pastors will do or say whatever it takes to fill his pews. They have even come up with a different gospel. I think scripture says a lot on that subject. Galatians 1:6-9 hits it dead center and says that who does this will be cursed. Yikes. I’m really not up to being cursed by God. Actually the Greek word from the original text is anathema, which means doomed or more bluntly let them be damned. Double yikes! Just look at all the false gospels that have proliferated our times and I will not go into detail in this posting, but just check out my other posts for details.
So what is my point? To sum it up in a few words, DON’T DO IT! DON’T CONDONE IT! God has been really gracious to me and opened my eyes to a lot that I had been deceived about. In my false conversion state (not Kentucky) I thought it was perfectly okay for me to listen to the secular artists that these “Christian” bands are covering. I also thought it was okay for me to drink, smoke, fornicate, look at porn, cuss, lie, steal pens from my employer and a million other things. But as the Lord opened my eyes that I was sinning against Him, that I had created a god in my image that accepted my sins and that I had made many false professions through my years that I needed to repent (stop doing these things and turn to God) and trust in Him and His Word. When I did that I began to see things a lot differently, you might say that I became a new creature 2 Cor. 5:17.
Just seek the Lord in this area. I did. You know what else? As I did He began to show me that some professing Christian artist might not be. I am cutting down my listening of a few certain groups. These claiming to be Christians and they do not glorify God in their craft, they sing about the same things the groups on secular stations sing about. So be ready for a little pruning if you seek His council.
In the mean time, look at this perversion of a pulpit area at New Spring Church and pray that these people will see how Holy and Righteous God is and pray that they will come to know God and not just about Him, that they will put away their god that allows this type of sin the penetrate a church building.





5 comments:
Wally, I love your blogs. This one in particular. Thanks for sharing this, I pray God uses it to open up people's eyes to how perverted the modern church is... Highway to Hell? Seriously...
A while back I went to a little concert and they also did a hysterical cover of the BSB's "I Want it That Way." It was so funny and I loved it, but after reading this, I'm reminded of the same old question that is popping up more and more in my daily thoughts: if it's not glorifying God, then what is it doing?
You and I are on the same page here. I think most music is junk anyway and listen to very little of it. Justin has been closely involved with the industry off and on, and I have been jaded and annoyed at so-called "Christian" artists who are anything but.
The link you provided was pretty shocking. I will say that some of them I found totally acceptable and many have enjoyed over the years (such as Geoff Moore's "Rescue Me" which I didn't know was secular until I heard it on a TV in the Hard Rock Cafe by the original band). I don't see the problem with Michael English covering "Go Rest High Upon That Mountain" or many of the others on that list.
But one that jumped out at me and shocked me the most was Rod Stewart's "Do Ya Think I'm Sexy" covered by Jars of Clay. Wow. I can't imagine why they think that's OK... unless they're attending one of those churches where the pastor is issuing 30-day challenges on that very subject. Yuck.
Actually I was just talking tonight with Justin about a similar issue... churches that are using secular songs as worship tunes. We were driving with the iPod on random and "If I Ain't Got You" by Alicia Keys came up. I told Justin some churches are now using that as a worship tune. I've heard through the grapevine that some are also using "Crazy in Love" by Beyonce, and Todd Friel has played that church using "You Spin Me Right Round." It's shocking, distressing, enraging, and sad.
Interestingly, today I finished a Christian novel about the dumbing down/sexing up of the church in America called "And the Shofar Blew" by Francine Rivers. I wish everyone would read it... starting with Perry Noble.
Another thing about hearing those cover songs is that it can take you back to a past time/place in your life and remind you of memories in your life associated with the song. That alone can be a temptation; if thought of wrongly. It can also glorify the Lord though if we are reminded of what He has done in us. However, I do know of someone that never wanted to listen to a certain type of music for that very reason. She stated that it made her want to do things she used to do...sinful things.
Some Christians, including artists, see media and go all chameleon - just becoming like what they hear, see, etc. Not healthy. Others go ostrich and bury their head in the sand blushing with embarrassment and being offended. Not healthy.
It seems that you have chosen the latter. Neither, to me, seems to reflect the way that Jesu engaged the world. Maybe there is a way to hear the world, to know its poetry (i.e. see Paul), and - rather than taking offense or absorbing its beliefs - we can develop a heart of compassion for the world, for what they think, for who they are.
I remember about 10 years ago a CCM article criticizing Jars of Clay for getting play on MTV.
Sad.
It is possible to have a healthy, critical, and compassionate engagement with the world. The Christians I know who listen to both Christian and secular media and do it with a Kingdom lens, are usually healthier and more relevant in expressing their faith. There is a Christian radio station in Atlanta, where I live, that, frankly, plays songs and has conversations that are more detrimental to living out vibrant, relevant faith in this world that a host of secular songs I know.
Don't misunderstand. I enjoy Christian music. But I think it is too shortsighted to assume that drawing a hard and fast line between secular and Christian media somehow glorifies God more than a healthy engagement with it.
We must guard against the Christian cloister.
Get those old Kansas albums back out and listen again, just differently. You'd be the better for it.
The person from Northlake ministry brought up some points that I would like to address. Unfortunately I will not do it in a comment, but will need to make a part 2 to this blog post.
I will say here that I have not "gone ostrich" (whatever that is supposed to infer). I am very open and do not blush or shy away from something that is in direct opposition to the Word of God.
A few verses that address this are:
1Peter 1:14-16 As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance:
But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation;
Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy. (Which was a reference of Leviticus 11:44)
1John 2:15-16 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
1 Petre 2:11 Dear friends, I urge you, as aliens and strangers in the world, to abstain from sinful desires, which war against your soul.
James 4:4 You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.
There are just so many things that the last commenter made that need to be addressed, because sadly these are the views that have permeated the churches. Which was exactly the point of my original posting. A good tree cannot bear good and bad fruit, a well can not bring forth sweet and bitter water.
By the points made I am under the impression that this person may be from the Rob Bell school of thinking.
I also think that as Christians we MUST (and are commanded to) draw hard and fast lines between everything that this world has to offer. Is this legalistic? No, it is biblical. Am I a modern day Pharisee? No, I am a true follower of the Lord Jesus Christ and actually believe what His Word says... That we become new creations, that we must shun the world, that we must not give season to the lusts of this earth and that we must follow Him and stop living for our own selves.
Post a Comment